Responding to conference reviews-This part is many highly relevant to areas like computer technology

Responding to conference reviews-This part is many highly relevant to areas like computer technology

Numerous seminars offer a author reaction duration: the writers are shown the reviews and so are offered limited room (say, 500 terms) to answer the reviews, such as for example by clarifying misunderstandings or responding to concerns. The writer reaction may also be known as a “rebuttal”, but I do not like this term since it sets an adversarial tone.

Your paper will simply be accepted if you have a champ for the paper: an individual who is worked up about it and can you will need to persuade the remainder committee to simply accept the paper. Your reaction has to offer ammo to your champ to conquer objections. If you haven’t a champ, then a absolute goal of the reaction would be to produce that champion.

Browse the reviews and decide what tips you will react to. You ought to concentrate on the most significant and ones that are substantive.

In your responses, forthrightly admit your errors. Do not ignore or avoid key dilemmas, particularly ones that multiple reviewers raised.

Your reaction to each true point will likely to be one paragraph in your reaction. Start the paragraph with a heading that is brief title concerning the point. Try not to assume that the reviewers remember precisely what ended up being published by every reviewer, nor which they will re-read their reviews before reading your reaction. (more…)

Continue Reading
Close Menu